i guess the “web 3.0″ moniker has stuck. business 2.0 recently did a nice multipage article on my company, radar networks. go read it. their description of what we’re doing is the best you can get for now ![]()
of course, nothing is perfect. their subtext is “web 3.0, no humans required”, and that’s not quite right. humans will always be an integral part of the web. it should be, web 3.0, making humans better. its about augmenting what you can do, not replacing you.
(there was also a less-exciting article in businessweek here. as they say, any press is good press)
Tags: tech